|
How do you work on an image?
SB: At the very beginning of a process, the work I undertake to
create a Dynamic Painting isn’t that much different from work required to create
a regular painting. First of all, I pick a subject and a main composition of the
painting. At that time I also select a color arrangement. The difference from
regular painting is that dynamic painting isn’t just one “frozen” composition
with fixed colors, but rather a set of all possible combinations that could be
generated later by a computer. Each of these combinations has to be pleasant to
the eye and I go through a much more rigorous process of picking colors than
most artists do. For example, a painting done in a conservative color scheme
shouldn’t have garish patches; or vice versa, a vibrant painting should be done
in an appropriate color gamma, without dark moody colors. The computer doesn’t
think up colors or shapes, it only creates variations of my concept. So it
places a burden on me as an artist to think of not only composition and colors
(as artists of static paintings do), but also to account for their
transformations over time.
What software are you using?
SB: The Dynamic Painting is a program, and for each new Dynamic
Painting I write a unique program. There is no off the shelf software that would
allow you to create something even remotely similar to my art. I’m both a programmer and an artist, so when it comes to a
Dynamic Painting, a computer is my “canvas” and the code I write is my “paint”.
When an artist creates a painting, you can think of a conceptual connection
between an original idea and the final painting as “brain – hand – canvas”. In
my case the scheme is a bit more complicated, but not drastically different:
“brain – hand – computer code – computer display”. As you can see, the creative
part (brain - hand) is effectively the same in traditional art and in my works.
Everything is defined by an artist’s concept. By changing parameters of the
program that displays a Dynamic Painting you won’t get different artistic
concepts, just different variations of the painting. This is why each time I
have to write a unique program for a new Dynamic Painting concept.
How old is the software? Are you developing it further?
How has the is, how has your work changed over the years?
SB: Since there is no existing software that would generate the
images and their variations the way I do, and the painting actually are the
software, the first question is kind of irrelevant. Since each Dynamic Painting is a new program, you could say
that the software is in a constant development. I could reuse and share some
portions of computer code between different paintings, but majority of the code
and algorithms describing artistic concepts are unique for each painting.
Over the years that I’ve been perfecting the concept of
Dynamic Painting, I’ve come a long way from fairly simple images to extremely
complicated concepts you can see in my latest works. All this hard work paid off
and I could proudly say that in terms of concepts and execution I’m years ahead
of anybody else creating some type of generative visual art.
How does your work on pictures look like? Are you sitting
in front a computer? What are you doing? How do you check (possible) results?
SB: Most of my time I spend at the computer, coding up the
algorithms for the paintings. Besides that, I spend a lot of time choosing color
compositions. Most often I do that by painting color blobs by hand and later
scanning them into a computer. Each Dynamic painting requires several hundred of
these palettes. The work on a Dynamic Painting somewhat resembles painting
with regular paints. I implement a fragment, reassess how it looks, how it
transforms. If I like the result, I add it to the final composition; otherwise I
go back and rewrite the code. It’s a very time consuming process and requires a
lot of iterations. Creation of a new Dynamic Painting could take from several
days to several weeks.
How are your works displayed? What software and hardware
do they require?
SB: To display a Dynamic Painting one would need a computer with
a powerful video card. At San Base Studio we can provide a completely set up
Dynamic Painting system that includes all the required hardware and software to
bring Dynamic Paintings to life.
Do you see programming as something completely different
from your work on paintings? Or is it a tool, a part of your art? SB:
As
I mentioned it earlier, the Dynamic Painting is a program. As such, it’s
absolutely impossible to separate programming from the art. In this case,
programming becomes a part of the art creation process. This is an art form of a
new digital millennium.
There is a
wide range of people appreciating art out there: from housewives to art critics.
Let’s say they have learned about the existence of the living painting and posed
a simple question to you “What’s this?” Please describe what they’d see and why
should they consider your work.
SB: When someone
glances at the painting, he or she won’t see anything unusual at first, just a
painting, hopefully in good taste. Should the same person look at it 10 minutes
later, he or she would be staring at a totally different picture! My guess is,
now this person begins to look at the picture carefully and notices that the
painting is slowly changing all the time. The shapes and colors smoothly morph
one into another. It resembles the movement of clouds across the sky. But clouds
are void of structure, and my works have definitions, there is a subject matter,
there is a theme. The living painting
always endeavors for new variants of expression, and it is never quite finished.
It is like watching an artist at work. Some works are excellent, others not so
much. An infinite quest for perfection.
When you
create new painting do you use pre-defined images? Do you visualize the end
result of your work? Or is the computer that applies its “creativity” to the
final outcome?
SB: We ought not to
treat the computer as a thinking machine.
It is at best a very, very complex calculator. The computer does not feel
anything; and everything you see on its screen, is man-made. The same goes for
my art. The computer is just the means.
An artist has his tools - brushes, a sculptor – a chisel. I create paintings,
and the computer just displays them. Off
course, I do not generate the infinite number of all possible combinations and
permutations. I generate the initial color palettes and forms (approximately
1,000 of initial images are done manually). Furthermore, I create the program,
which transforms colors and shapes. In other words, I prescribe its future
behavior. After that, the painting begins to live on it
own.
If someone
wishes to master the technology of dynamic painting, will you share your
invention with others? Will dynamic paintings grow in popularity? Do you suppose
it is the genre of future?
SB: I will begin
with the second question: I’m confident, that dynamic paintings will be
widespread in the near future. Today the only obstacle is the equipment cost. A
good quality high definition flat display along with the computer could entail
many thousands of dollars. But as we all know, electronic goods are getting
better all the time while its price keeps on dropping. With the advent of large
and inexpensive flat screens, this new movement in art will become extremely
popular. The benefits of this genre are obvious: an endless supply of unprecedented and
unpredictable paintings in the place of one static image. The technique that I’ve contrived for a
dynamic painting, guarantees always a new juxtaposition of colors and shapes in
an abstract picture. On a landscape there would be moving clouds, darting birds,
and trees swaying in the wind. And seasons, the painting would change in
seasons. Unlike a movie, the painting never ends and never repeats itself. It has a life of its own. Science fiction?
Not at all, this is a very near future.
As far as students
of this form of art are concerned, they must possess two talents: the
depictive skill and computer programming. I am not saying there are no such
people, I myself am an artist and computer programmer, but I do know other
people with the same combination of skills. I do not intend to make a secret of
this technology; I am ready to share it with talented folks.
Is it possible
to acquire a dynamic painting for a private use today? What equipment is
required to connect it at home?
SB: Certainly, it’s
possible. Today each dynamic painting is custom made, so the owner can enjoy the one and
only copy of his own. The work on a new painting takes from one to two weeks. As
soon as the sale is made, the original is destroyed.
We
also offer
limited editions - when a small number of copies are made. Of
course, all the paintings are different at any given point in time, even within
the same batch. I realize that today
only people with the means above average can acquire dynamic paintings. On the
other hand, the dynamic painting is something truly unique without any
precedence! It is the art of the XXI century. There are no
special technical requirements for a Dynamic Painting. A power outlet is all it
takes. A flat screen TV plays the role
of canvas, a small device provides a video feed to the TV. The screen is mounted
on a wall, the Dynamic Painting display system can is placed somewhere out of the way,
where it won’t be seen. That’s all. Once is system is turned, it
always stays on.
Dynamic paintings are available in three different
media formats. First, there is the dynamic painting itself. In addition, there also static images, which
are stills taken off the dynamic painting. These are excellent, and are
available on canvas. The third media type is a recording of the dynamic painting
on a DVD. Its quality is lesser than that of the dynamic painting system, and it
repeats itself after an hour, but works on any DVD player.
|